We think of you often, R. Sometimes we look at your pictures and wish we could give you a big hug! We love you. G and G.

























In the early morning it's a good time to walk but it is crisp.
Horses still graze at people walking along country roads.
Slick's cows wait each morning for food.
After V and G sewed a few days, we drove out to E. in Tularosa. In southern New Mexico snow caps a few of the cholla cacti.
If you like pastachios, you might want to visit the Pastachio Tree Ranch in Tularosa NM.
Then we traveled to St. G to visit older daughter & C. We ate at our favorite, Rio Cafe, saw Footloose and Aida at Tuacahn with beautiful weather one night and not the other night! I took the dogs for walks, so now I think they like me and I visited the local great quilt shops. 
Then we headed out again to visit Grand Canyon. Dad has never seen it before. I had seen it, but could not remember too much. We took lots of photos, but believe me nothing can do it justice. It should be called Grandest Canyon, not just Grand! It was so beautiful.

On the way home we stayed at La Posada, a restored Harvey House, a main stopover for Santa Fe railroad travelers.

| | |
The husband who’s tapping the computer keys during an important phone conversation with you, the S.U.V. driver with the grande latte and the cellphone, the dinner companion with the roving eye and twitching thumbs — are not only irritating, they are incompetent.
A team of researchers were trying to find out what unusual cognitive gifts multitaskers possessed that made them so successful at multitasking.
They’re still looking.
“Multitaskers were just lousy at everything,” said Clifford I. Nass, a professor of communication at Stanford and one of the study’s investigators. “I was sure they had some secret ability."
But it turns out that high multitaskers are suckers for . . . irrelevancy.”
Initially suspecting that multi-taskers possessed some rare and enviable qualities that helped them process simultaneous channels of information, “We kept looking for multitaskers’ advantages in this study. But we kept finding only disadvantages. We thought multitaskers were very much in control of information.
"It turns out, they were just getting it all confused.”
To the rest of the world the study’s findings aren’t quite so shocking. A constant state of stress, deluges of ever-changing information, the frenzied, nanosecond-fast hustle and bustle — is bad for you.
“The core of the problem,” Professor Nass said, is that the multitaskers “think they’re great at what they do; and they’ve convinced everybody else they’re good at it, too.”
Yes, they have.
New York Times - August 30 , 2009